Claremont serial killer - Claremont killer verdict: Edwards guilty of 2 murders however guiltless over wife Spiers' death



Claremont killer verdict: Edwards guilty of 2 murders however guiltless over wife Spiers' death

 Bradley Henry M. Robert Edwards, a 51-year-old former Telstra technician from Western Australia, has been found guilty of the murders of Jane Rimmer and Ciara Glennon however not guilty of the murder Of his partner Spears is among the Claremont serial murder cases, Australia's longest and costliest criminal investigation.

The Claremont serial killings visit the deaths of Rimmer, 23, Glennon, 27, and Spiers, 18, between 1996 and 1997. All 3 ladies went missing when an evening out at the Claremont amusement district in Perth’s name western residential district.

The bodies of Rimmer and Glennon were found to drop in bushland at opposite ends of the state capital. Spiers was ne'er found and is plausible dead.

Justice author Hall delivered his long-anticipated verdicts on Th.

Edwards was inactive in 2016 and charged with willfully murdering Spiers, Rimmer, and Glennon, similarly as for indecently assaulting an Associate in Nursing 18-year-old girl throughout a burglary at her Huntingdale direct Gregorian calendar month 1988, and abducent and raping a 17-year-old woman in Gregorian calendar month 1995 in Claremont.

The prolonged judge-alone trial ran from Nov 2019 to June 2020 within the Western Australia supreme court.

The case against Edwards lively on “four key planks of evidence”, the prosecuting attorney Carmel Barbagallo SC told the court.

The first was a surprise confession from Edwards before the trial began last Gregorian calendar month. Edwards pleaded guilty to abducent and raping the 17-year-old woman whereas she was walking alone through Rowe Park when an evening goes into Claremont in 1995. He certain and drove her to Karrakatta site, wherever he raped her double before selling her naked in bushland.

Edwards conjointly confessed to breaking into the house of the 18-year-old girl – WHO he aforementioned he knew – and assaulting her in 1988.

In each case, the state had sturdy proof against Edwards: DNA retrieved from intimate swabs of the 17-year-old survivor in hospital shortly when her rape was matched to Edwards; and therefore the state recovered Edwards’ DNA from a silk robe left at the Huntingdale crime scene.

During the trial, the prosecution contends the part of Edwards’ 12-hour police interview following his 2016 arrest, wherever he denied any involvement in either crime.

Barbagallo argued the very fact he song to the police and later confessed to the crimes solid “serious doubt” over his denied involvement within the Claremont killings. each crime showed he had the chance, skill, and capability to abduct and murder ladies as they walked alone in Claremont.

The prosecution conjointly pointed to the very fact Edwards’ DNA was found underneath Glennon’s left thumb and middle nail throughout testing in 2008. Edwards admitted it was his DNA, however aforementioned he didn’t savvy it had got there.

The states’ final 2 items of proof came from ninety-eight essential fibers found on the bodies of Rimmer, Glennon, and therefore the 17-year-old rape survivor.

Fabric fibers found on the 3 ladies were factory-made within the distinctive color ‘Telstra navy’, and matched the pants Edwards would have worn within the 90s as a Telstra technician.

Finally, fibers found in Rimmer and Glennon’s hair matched the seat insert and carpet material employed in a 1996 VS Holden commissioned naval officer, constant build and model of automobile  Edwards drove around the time of their murders. throughout the trial, the international fiber professional Ray linksman told the court it was “highly unlikely” these fibers got there out of the blue.

During the trial, the prosecution created many different arguments. Barbagallo pointed to the very fact that showing emotion distressing events within the breakdown of Edwards’ initial wedding happened around the same time as every murder.

Edwards had a history of violence throughout showing emotion distressing times: as a 21-year-old he had grabbed and tried to force a piece of cloth into the mouth of a 40-year-old welfare worker whereas operating as a telecommunication technician at Hollywood hospital. A court-ordered psychological report at the time aforementioned Edwards had been in distress that week when his factual better half confessed to cheating on him.

In her closing outline, Barbagallo aforementioned the “emotional upset” argument wouldn’t be relied upon owing to the “way the proof [had] fallen”.

During the trial, Justice author Hall conjointly threw out the prosecution’s argument that, given there have been solely six unsolved feminine murders in Perth’s western suburbs from 1988 till Edwards’ arrest, it was a lot of seemingly for the 3 Claremont killings to own been committed by the constant person.

It was rather more tough for the prosecution to prove an affiliation between Edwards and therefore the plausible murder of Spiers, only if her body was ne'er found.

But Barbagallo aforementioned that his ambush-style attacks on the 17- and 18-year-old ladies matched the routine in Spiers’ case.

Several witnesses found seeing a person matching Edwards’ description driving a Telstra vehicle slowly around Claremont and a close-by residential district late at the hours of darkness within the mid-1990s, giving lifts to different ladies. Witnesses conjointly aforementioned they detected a series of high-pitched screams within the Mosman Park space the night of Spiers’ murder, and 2 of these witnesses saw an automobile that looked just like Edwards’.

Unlike the prosecution WHO referred to as many witnesses, together with Edwards’ ex-wives and former colleagues, the defense referred to as none. Edwards conjointly didn't testify in his defense.

The defense’s case was spirited on casting doubt over the deoxyribonucleic acid fragments found at a lower place Glennon’s fingernails that tie her back to Edwards.

Edwards’ lawyer, Paul Yovich SC, argued there was a “fraction of a nanogram” of DNA found underneath her fingernails, that might have gotten there via an opportunity encounter at the pothouse she was at the night she disappeared.

Yovich conjointly argued that the sample might are contaminated at PathWest, the science lab wherever it was tested. PathWest was already storing Edwards’ deoxyribonucleic acid among the samples taken from the 17-year-old rape survivor.

He pointed to many instances wherever proof with reference to this case had been contaminated by PathWest scientists. He was aforesaid that the DNA of the many scientists had been discovered on samples that, in one case, DNA from a definite crime scene was found on a twig far from Rimmer’s body.

During the trial, the world-renowned DNA skilled apple Whitaker told the court it had been “extremely unlikely” that the sample had been contaminated.

In his closing address, Yovich put together pointed to a scratch found on the instrumentation holding Glennon’s nail clipping, an argument that there was “no satisfactory explanation” on why it had been there.

Hall aforesaid the mark gave the impression to be “dried smear marks, dried droplets”, not scratches, that may have happened once the sample was swabbed associated tested in a passing UK of the nice UK and European country laboratory in 2008, where Edwards’ DNA was recovered.

No comments:

Post a Comment