Notre Dame football - Notre Dame Football: Grading the offensive position teams vs. USF

 Notre Dame football - Notre Dame Football: Grading the offensive position teams vs. USF

 After a frustrating opener against Duke, Notre Dame’s offense got right during a major method against USF. That’s, of course, what they were speculated to do. USF isn't a decent team, the UN agency is within the starting stages of a build. Still, their defense was a strength last season, and that they did look sensible against The stronghold.

However, it was clear from the gap drive that USF was merely not sturdy enough, quick enough, or just proficient enough to play with Notre Dame, on either facet of the ball. From prime to bottom the offense looked more leisurely. Ian Book created the sport look simple, and also the Irish blew USF off the ball all day long.

So, however, did the offensive position teams grade out, once taking care of business against a team they were expected to require care of business against?

Grade: B

Ian Book took care of loads of the problems that he struggled with against Duke. He had happy feet against Duke as if he was expecting to want to scramble. Against USF, he was abundant calmer within the pocket. He went through his progressions while not attempting to play. That helped his accuracy vastly.

For the foremost half, Book was organized through the air. He was able to choose and select the UN agency he needed to throw to and enraptured the fuck up and down the sphere with ease. Now, he ne'er did manage to seek out the endzone through the air, however, Book did run the ball three times within the first 0.5.

If there was an area to critique Book it might be that the offense still wasn’t explosive within the pass. That isn’t to mention that the pass was ineffective. It simply lacked that ability to blow the highest off the defense that parades the sphere for AN offense. He conjointly had occasional accuracy problems, wherever he lost passes that he has to build. Those were few and much between, though.

Book finished the day 12/19 for 143 yards, with no touchdowns or interceptions. He conjointly ran for three touchdowns on the bottom, except for solely nine yards.

Backup quarterback role player Pyne saw his 1st action in school, going 1/2 for five yards.

Running Backs
Grade: A-

If last week was the Kyren Willaims show, in the week was a show of depth and force at the back position. 3 running backs had a minimum of sixty yards dashing, whereas C’Bo Flemister crystal rectifier the team with 127 yards dashing on simply thirteen carries. That’s 9.8 yards per bit. Chris Tyree and Kyren Williams had sixty-five and sixty-two yards severally.

While Book had three dashing touchdowns, the backspace found pay dirt three times themselves. Flemister, Tyree, and Jaffar Armstrong all created their method into the endzone, tho' Armstrong solely had seven yards on seven carries.

The backspace had one or two queries between themselves. However, nobody stood out as a target out of the formation. Meanwhile, Tommy Tremble spent loads of your time in a similar way of hybrid fullback role, wherever he dominated as a lead blocker all afternoon long.

Where did they struggle? Kyren Williams did fumble the ball, and even though Notre Dame recovered the error, it’s ne'er acceptable to place the ball on the bottom.

Wide Receivers/Tight Ends
Grade: C

It’s setting out to seem to be it'd be a protracted year for the wide receivers. Between the complete cluster of wide receivers and tight ends, they caught a complete of nine passes against USF. That’s during a game wherever Notre Dame scored fifty-two points. That lack of production from the receiving targets nearly doesn’t appear attainable during a blowout like what Notre Dame placed on USF.

It’s with great care clear there’s nobody guy UN agency will dominate opponents the method that Myles Boykin, Chase Claypool, Golden Tate, can Fuller, or Michael Floyd. while not a clear target, the UN agency will get open despite what the coverage is, Book has struggled to seek out receivers down.

The receivers and ends did block okay for those running backs. That’s the sort of excellent, selfless, play you would like out of receivers. the problem is that’s most of what they did as a gaggle throughout the sport.

Michael Mayer did flash his size and strength once more, however, a flash is all he was able to offer. He’ll grow into an excellent end someday, however, he’s not dominating defenses simply nevertheless. it was conjointly nice to urge Braden Lenzy back from his mysterious absence, and he had a solid game for himself.

Offensive Line
Grade: A

For how frustrating the offensive line was last week, they were even as dominant in the week. it was finally however the offensive line was supposed to engulf a weaker opponent.

The spent the sports processing USF off the ball, busting holes open for the bevy of running backs UN agency took full advantage. They did therefore early and sometimes, setting the tone for Notre Dame. because the game went on, they stayed sturdy, however, the USF line of defense appeared to crumble, not desperate to get hit any longer.

At an equivalent time that they dominated USF within the football play, the offensive line didn’t hand over something within the pass. Book didn’t feel pressure, ought to scramble, and he was able to work his method through his reads all day long. This dominance helped Book surpass, and was different from the tone of the pass against Duke.

No comments:

Post a Comment